UBO register
The UBO register of the Chamber of Commerce contained public information on all beneficial owners (ultimate beneficial owners, UBOs) of all companies and other legal entities (including foundations and associations) incorporated in the Netherlands, with all its privacy and security risks. In 2021, Privacy First therefore challenged the UBO register in court.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cdeb/8cdeb9713b1358acfb3559f324e7e1e2b6924da5" alt="Wooden court gavel"
In early 2021, Privacy First and Boekx Advocaten filed a lawsuit against the State over the new UBO register. Under the legislation on which the UBO register is based, all 1.5 million legal entities registered in the Trade Register had to disclose all kinds of privacy-sensitive information about their UBOs ('ultimate stakeholders'). This concerned millions of directors, shareholders and senior executives of all Dutch companies, foundations, associations, churches, etc. Privacy Firstte deemed this a massive privacy violation with major personal security risks. Privacy First therefore requested the court to declare the UBO register unlawful. After all, much of the information in the UBO register would be publicly accessible. Privacy First considered this completely disproportionate and in violation of European privacy law. The District Court of The Hague then ruled that indeed the legality of the European money laundering directives on which the UBO register was based could be questioned. In appeal the Hague Court of Appeal also stressed that a UBO fearing for its security could shield this personal data from the general public. In a similar Luxembourg case supported by Privacy First the EU court ruled subsequently that the public accessibility of all UBO registers in the European Union violates European privacy law. Since then, the Dutch UBO register has not been publicly accessible. Privacy First continues to monitor developments critically.